🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states exercised their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations restart.

Trump recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to dictate their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."